Pristine York Occasions’ plagiarism marketing consultant Jonathan Bailey exempted his “full analysis” of the allegations towards Vice President Kamala Harris and located them “more serious” than he to begin with believed.
“At the time, I was unaware of a full dossier with additional allegations, which led some to accuse the New York Times of withholding that information from me. However, the article clearly stated that it was my ‘initial reaction’ to those allegations, not a complete analysis,” Bailey wrote on Plagiarism Today Wednesday. “Today, I reviewed the complete dossier prepared by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have covered before. I also performed a peer review of one of his papers in 2018.”
“With this new information, while I believe the case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times, the overarching points remain. While there are problems with this work, the pattern points to sloppy writing habits, not a malicious intent to defraud,” he added.
Plagiarism marketing consultant Jonathan Bailey discoverable he had most effective reviewed the examples given to him by means of the Pristine York Occasions on the generation. (Getty Pictures)
KAMALA HARRIS ACCUSED OF PLAGIARIZING IN 2009 BOOK ABOUT BEING ‘SMART ON CRIME’
“Is it problematic? Yes. But it’s also not the wholesale fraud that many have claimed it to be. It sits somewhere between what the two sides want it to be,” he stated.
Occasion Bailey persisted to argue the examples had been extra similar to sloppy paintings or negligence instead than malice from Harris, he conceded some, particularly two paragraphs copied immediately from Wikipedia, had been unclouded examples of plagiarism.
“To be clear, that is plagiarism. It’s compounded by the fact that Wikipedia is typically not seen as a reliable source, and, according to Weber, there was an error in the information,” Bailey wrote.
He concluded, “Ultimately, I recognize that this view will make absolutely no one happy. I don’t feel that the book is a product of wholesale malicious plagiarism, nor do I think it’s free from problems. No matter your side, this will be an unsatisfactory answer.”
In a New York Times article dissecting the claims, Bailey claimed the examples amounted “to an error and not an intent to defraud.” He accused conservative activist Chris Rufo, who reported the tale, of taking minor infractions and looking to “make a big deal of it.”
Harris has been accused of plagiarizing greater than two quantity passages in her 2009 retain. (AP/Jacquelyn Martin)
On the other hand, he next revealed on X that he had most effective reviewed the 5 examples supplied to him by means of the Pristine York Occasions and had no longer appeared on the complete research.
“For those coming here from the NY Times Article. I want to be clear that I have NOT performed a full analysis of the book. My quotes were based on information provided to me by the reporters and spoke only about those passages,” he wrote.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
Rufo first reported Monday on so-called “plagiarism hunter,” Austrian tutor Stefan Weber, discovering 27 occasions that Harris and her co-author allegedly dedicated some method of plagiarism, writing, “24 fragments are plagiarism from other authors, [and] 3 fragments are self-plagiarism from a work written with a co-author.”
Conservative activist Christopher Rufo reported at the allegations Monday. ((Photograph by means of Justin Sullivan/Getty Pictures), Proper: (Photograph by means of Thomas Simonetti for The Washington Publish by way of Getty Pictures))
“Taken in total, there is certainly a breach of standards here. Harris and her co-author duplicated long passages nearly verbatim without proper citation and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism,” Rufo wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
