Critics have presented a fact-check on Vice President Kamala Harris’ declare that the U.S. has “not one member of the United States military who is on active duty” in a fight zone “for the first time this century,” indicating that the commentary is deceptive.
Harris made the declare in Tuesday’s debate with former President Trump. Generation her phraseology left room for interpretation, it’s unclouded that there are U.S. troops in hurt’s method world wide.
“As of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is on active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century,” Harris stated right through the Presidential Debate on ABC.
The Pentagon advised Fox Information Virtual provider that participants are stationed in diverse bad places however famous that the ones deployments are made by means of the Government Section and no longer because of wars declared by means of Congress.
“An aspect of military service includes serving in locations where hostile actions may occur,” a Protection Legit stated. “Those locations are designated by executive order and/or the Secretary of Defense.”
I BELIEVE PENNSYLVANIA WILL ‘MAKE THE DIFFERENCE’ IN 2024 ELECTION: REP: MADELEINE DEAN
“However, it’s important to note that just because a service member is in one of these locations does not mean they are engaged in war,” the authentic added. “The U.S. is not currently engaged in a war and does not have troops fighting in active war zones anywhere in the world.”
Vice President Kamala Harris went viral along with her reaction to a query about how she would deliver unwell costs, in an interview with Philadelphia’s 6 ABC anchor Brian Taff. (Screenshot/6 ABC Philadelphia)
Mark 1st viscount montgomery of alamein, a retired rear admiral and senior director for the Middle on Cyber and Tech Innovation on the Understructure for Protection of Self-government, advised Fox Information Virtual that the U.S. has “quietly shut down designations of war zones over the past few years.”
“I would ask: Is anyone getting combat-related hazardous duty pay?” 1st viscount montgomery of alamein added. “The answer is yes,” and famous Syria case in point.
JESUS MARQUEZ ON TRUMP’S CHANCES IN BATTLEGROUND STATE: ‘ABSOLUTELY WE CAN TAKE NEVADA’
The Pentagon didn’t touch upon whether or not troops in international locations comparable to Syria, Jordan or Iraq or on alternative bases across the Heart East have won hazardous responsibility pay over the date 10 months as Iran has sponsored proxies together with the Houthis and Hezbollah.
A switch case is unloaded right through the dignified switch rite of the rest of 3 U.S. provider participants killed within the drone assault at the U.S. army outpost in Jordan, at Dover Breeze Drive Bottom in Dover, Delaware, on February 2, 2024. (Roberto Schmidt/AFP by means of Getty Pictures)
Hazardous Responsibility Pay is sent at a per month charge of $225 and is payable to a member who’s subjected to adverse hearth, explosion of adverse mines or alternative adverse motion month acting responsibility in a adverse hearth section, uncovered to a adverse hearth tournament or killed, injured or wounded by means of adverse hearth or explosion, according to Military.com.
Army participants serving in Lebanon were eligible for hazardous responsibility pay since 1983, month the ones in Syria were eligible since 2003 and 2014 for land and wind fight, respectively. Iraq has remained an eligible pocket since 1990.
Robert Greenway, fight veteran of the U.S. Particular Forces and previous senior director for the Nationwide Safety Council (NSC) right through the Trump management, famous that the U.S. has “continuously” deployed troops to fight zones because the 1991 Gulf Conflict.
HARRIS-TRUMP SHOWDOWN: GOP CHAIR VOWS ‘WE ABSOLUTELY HAVE THE RESOURCES’ TO WIN IN NOVEMBER
“The assertion is especially egregious, as she is the current VP and should know that we recently conducted a raid in Syria killing a senior ISIS commander, several U.S. troops had to be medically evacuated after another raid against ISIS in Syria,” Greenway advised Fox Information Virtual. “Several servicemembers were wounded in Iraq when Al Asad Airbase was attacked by Iranian sponsored terrorists less than a month ago, and our ships are under near-daily attack in the Red Sea.”
This image taken on January 4, 2024, displays a view of the headquarters of Iraq’s Widespread Mobilisation Forces (PMF) paramilitaries in Baghdad, which used to be centered at the identical moment by means of a U.S. hit. (Ahmad al–Rubaye/AFP by means of Getty Pictures)
“A current VP unaware of our military operations in combat overseas is a dereliction of duty,” Greenway added.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The U.S. has kind of 2,500 troops in Iraq lonely, despite the fact that Iraqi officers this month noticeable that they have got labored out a tentative plan for the U.S. to take back maximum of its troops by means of 2025 and reduce a residual power, The Washington Post reported.
“The first phase will begin this year and continue until 2025, while the second phase will conclude in 2026,” Iraqi Protection Minister Thabit al-Abbasi stated right through an look on tv.
